Proposal: Add a strict version of foldlWithKey to Data.Map

[Johan Tibell]

On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Ian Lynagh <igloo at earth.li> wrote:

> Well, if there's a GHC code performance bug then we should fix it, but I
> don't think we should use a workaround in the libraries that gives a
> function the wrong strictness.
>

The generated core has the strictness we want, the Haskell just doesn't
reflect that (which means it could break in the future). I think we should
stick with the current definition until we can come up with a better one
that still gives the right core.

I've filed a bug: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/4267
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20100822/f1efdb4d/attachment.html