#4189: Add (<.>) operator (generalizing (.) to Functor)
Maciej Marcin Piechotka
uzytkownik2 at gmail.com
Sun Aug 1 10:25:20 EDT 2010
On 01/08/10 16:05, Felipe Lessa wrote:
> +1
>
> What should be its fixity?
>
I guess right:
\a b c -> a <.> b <.> c
:: (Functor f) =>
(a1 -> b) -> (a11 -> a1) -> (a -> f a11) -> a -> f b
As opposed to:
\a b c -> a <.> b <.> c
:: (Functor f, Functor f1) =>
(a1 -> b) -> (a11 -> f a1) -> (a -> f1 a11) -> a -> f1 (f b)
Regards
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 900 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20100801/73da2b22/signature.bin
More information about the Libraries
mailing list