patch to process 184.108.40.206
jwlato at gmail.com
Tue May 19 10:15:08 EDT 2009
Thanks very much for this patch. I also do development on OSX
10.4.11, and was very disappointed to find out that ghc-6.10.3 didn't
compile for me. I didn't really have time to spend on it then, so I
just went back to using 6.10.1.
Did you install GNU make manually as well? The make provided with the
last XCode doesn't work for me either with ghc-6.10.3.
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:28:08 +0900
> From: Yusaku Hashimoto <nonowarn at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Patch to process 220.127.116.11
> To: Neil Mitchell <ndmitchell at gmail.com>
> Cc: libraries at haskell.org
> Message-ID: <026A3F34-48A0-4690-8F10-056349FD14AA at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
> Thank you for suggestion, Neil.
> I have created a ticket on trac.
> On 2009/05/19, at 19:49, Neil Mitchell wrote:
>> Hi Yusaku,
>> So your patch doesn't get lost, can I suggest you file a GHC bug
>> report and attach your patch to that?
>> Thanks for the work in putting together a patch,
>> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Yusaku Hashimoto
>> <nonowarn at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I think I had not described context or purpose of my patch in last
>>> mail. I'm going to explain the details about why the error occurs and
>>> how the patch works. before and from I sent the patch, I have
>>> inspected about them. So the detail was complicated but
>>> interesting for me, I enjoyed it.
>>> Well, this patch seems to be useful only on the old-fashiond Mac OS X
>>> 10.4.11, because no same error is not reported from anyone, and
>>> I'm an
>>> only ghc user who uses Mac OS X 10.4.11. And ghc seemed to has
>>> to support the 10.4. This implies the patch should not be applied to
>>> the repository. But if there are a few users like me, my patch and
>>> report may be useful for (him|her).
More information about the Libraries