time library dependencies

[Ashley Yakeley]

Malcolm Wallace wrote:
> OK, I object to the proposed change.  The time library is pretty core,
> and should continue to be buildable by compilers and interpreters other
> than GHC.  This does not necessarily mean it must be strictly H'98
> compliant, but that would be a good approximation of the common
> language.

Can I switch it to base 4.1, or will that also cause problems?

-- 
Ashley