Issues with new Control.Exception
Bertram Felgenhauer
bertram.felgenhauer at googlemail.com
Wed Jan 28 17:02:43 EST 2009
John Goerzen wrote:
> * Catch doesn't work in many common cases anymore. In particular,
> the example right there in haddock is broken:
>
> catch (openFile f ReadMode)
> (\e -> hPutStr stderr ("Couldn't open "++f++": " ++ show e))
>
> That's broken, of course, because the type of e isn't fixed.
> But it's also broken because openFile has a different return type
> than hPutStr.
Which means it has been broken for quite some time.
> * I like the new system overall, but it is annoying that
> we can't do the sort of catch that is contemplated in the example
> above anymore. This is especially annoying for me in several cases
> where I want to catch *any* exception and do things with it,
> especially when doing unit testing.
You can actually do that - all you have to do is catch SomeException, say
openFile f ReadMode `catch` \e -> do
hPutStrLn stderr $
"Couldn't open " ++ f ++ ": " ++ show (e :: SomeException)
throw e
This works because SomeException is an instance of the Exception class
with the obvious trivial implementations for toException and
fromException. It should be documented, of course.
onException does basically that - so it works for any exceptions:
onException :: IO a -> IO b -> IO a
onException io what = io `catch` \e -> do what
throw (e :: SomeException)
HTH,
Bertram
More information about the Libraries
mailing list