Splitting SYB from the base package in GHC 6.10
ross at soi.city.ac.uk
Tue Sep 16 04:41:33 EDT 2008
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 01:28:30PM +0200, José Pedro Magalhães wrote:
> Are the details sorted out? Summarizing:
> * Data.Generics.Basics stays in base;
> * All other SYB modules besides Data.Generics.Instances go into a new
> 'syb' package;
> * Data.Generics.Instances is split in two, one part remaining in
> base and the other moving to the syb package.
Sounds good. Those that remain in base need no longer be orphans.
Regarding Complex, I think your point that it exports (:+) determines
that the derived instance is appropriate.
> * These 6 instances have abstract datatypes. Unless there is some reason to
> keep them in base, I suggest they go into the syb package:
> DataType TyCon TypeRep Handle ThreadId StablePtr
I'd lean slightly toward keeping with their definitions in base, but
it's not a blocker like the others.
What shall we call the module defining the Data class? Data.Data?
More information about the Libraries