proposal #2254: have Control.Arrow re-export (>>>) and (<<<)
Ross Paterson
ross at soi.city.ac.uk
Thu May 1 12:18:12 EDT 2008
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 04:55:47PM -0700, Don Stewart wrote:
> ross:
> > A previous proposal:
> >
> > http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1773
> >
> > split the Arrow class, making (>>>) and (<<<) functions in
> > Control.Category. This breaks programs that use Control.Arrow.
> >
> > To avoid some of the breakage, the proposal is that Control.Arrow should
> > re-export (>>>) and (<<<), imported from Control.Category.
>
> This patch has been applied (xmonad was broken due to the change, so I
> thought it best to act).
I thought we had a process for API changes.
I'm not sure what the right thing is here. I usually prefer to avoid
re-exports because they create problems with warnings.
More information about the Libraries
mailing list