agreeing a policy for maintainers and hackageDB

[Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho]

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:51:43PM +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> If a few more people could read this nice short policy and say "yes that
> looks fine, I agree" then that would be very helpful.

Yes, that looks fine, I agree :)

I would prefer that a missing Maintainer field were a bug in the
metadata instead of being semantically significant.  Otherwise there
would be no way of distinguishing between "I forgot to add my Maintainer
line" and "I am not supporting this".

-- 
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, Jyväskylä, Finland
http://antti-juhani.kaijanaho.fi/newblog/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/antti-juhani/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20080624/47444c32/attachment.bin