ANNOUNCE: Pipe 1.0

[Simon Marlow]

Isaac Dupree wrote:
> Don Stewart wrote:
>> Interesting.
>> Does it depend on an unreleased version of the process library?
> 
> by the way, is there a policy for when new versions of packages 
> maintained by libraries at h.o are *released*?  Or do patches just collect 
> in the darcs repository until they're picked up by some major release 
> like GHC's?  I would tend to think that for any change nontrivial enough 
> to be discussed on libraries@, why not quickly release the newer version 
> with an appropriately incremented version number?

There are some further changes we've been discussing, see Duncan's message 
here:

http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/2008-May/009695.html

and I'd like to batch all these together in one release.

Cheers,
	Simon