Proposal: Extensible exceptions

[Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH]

On 2008 Jul 4, at 9:56, Simon Marlow wrote:

> In fact, this applies to catchAny too.  It should come with a strong  
> warning, and a suggestion that any unrecognised exceptions should be  
> re-thrown.  Most uses of catchAny are to implement

Given that it just tries a catch with each exception in the list, why  
couldn't it automatically re-throw if none matches?

-- 
brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] allbery at kf8nh.com
system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allbery at ece.cmu.edu
electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university    KF8NH