Proposal: Add concatMapM function (#2042)

Neil Mitchell ndmitchell at
Tue Jan 29 07:29:55 EST 2008


> > I think we should ignore the generalization to
> > genericSuperDuperConcatMapMXYZ for now :).
> Why?

Orthogonality. It is silly to have have superConcatMapM, but not
superMapM. If that wants doing it should be a separate proposal after
this one.



More information about the Libraries mailing list