cpphs and C++-style comments

Mon Sep 17 10:03:05 EDT 2007

Sven Panne <sven.panne at aedion.de> wrote:

> On Friday 14 September 2007 22:06, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
> > In particular, we could swap --strip back to mean
> > what it used to mean (the current --strip-c89 behaviour), and find a
> > new name for the eol-stripping flag.
> 
> That seems to be the right way IMHO.

OK, done.  The new option name is --strip-eol, and --strip-c89 is gone.

Regards,
    Malcolm