[Haskell] Re: Trying to install binary-0.4
ketil+haskell at ii.uib.no
Sun Oct 28 17:42:25 EDT 2007
Simon Marlow <simonmarhaskell at gmail.com> writes:
>> Looks like an orthogonal issue to me. Am I missing something?
> Probably it could be made clearer. In 4.2 the idea is that instead of
> base-2.0 ==> base-3.0 + directory-1.0 + array-1.0 + ...
> you would replace
> base-2.0 ==> newbase-1.0 + directory-1.0 + array-1.0 + ...
That's pretty clear, thanks. Couldn't you still do this by
recompiling the libraries, *if* the re-exporting feature turns out to
be stumbling block.
> Thinking about this is really making my head hurt, I need to go back
> to doing something easy like writing Haskell :-)
If it leads to better/more robust libraries, I'm happy to pick up the
bill for that bottle of aspirin. :-)
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants
More information about the Libraries