Proposal: Add &&& and *** to Data.Tuple

[Conal Elliott]

It wouldn't have to be a change.  We could add these new synonyms.  I'm
personally happy with first & second for use with functions & other Arrow
types.  My main suggestion is that if we want new names for memorability,
then let's add them for the general meanings rather than the specialized
ones.

On 10/15/07, Bertram Felgenhauer <bertram.felgenhauer at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Changing the names of 'first' and 'second' in Control.Arrow is a bad
> idea, I think. It'll break a lot of packages.


[...]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20071016/43518191/attachment.htm