[Haskell] Re: Trying to install binary-0.4

Bayley, Alistair Alistair_Bayley at invescoperpetual.co.uk
Tue Oct 16 09:01:01 EDT 2007

> From: Simon Marlow [mailto:simonmarhaskell at gmail.com] 
> The lexicographical ordering would make 10.0 > 9.3.  In 
> general, A.B > C.D 
> iff A > C or A == C && B > D.  When we say the "latest" 
> version we mean 
> "greatest", implying that version numbers increase with time. 
>  Does that help?

Sort of. It's what I'd expect from a sensible version comparison. It's
just not something I'd ever choose to call lexicographic ordering. IMO,
lexicographgic ordering is a basic string comparision so e.g.

max "10.0" "9.3" = "9.3"

I'd call what you're doing numeric ordering. Does it have a better name,
like version-number-ordering, or section-number-ordering (e.g. Section
3.2.5, Section 3.2.6)?

Confidentiality Note: The information contained in this message,
and any attachments, may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. It is intended solely for the person(s) or entity to
which it is addressed. Any review, retransmission, dissemination,
or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by
persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is
prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the
sender and delete the material from any computer.

More information about the Libraries mailing list