Proposal: ByteString based datagram
communication (Ticket #1238 )
rob at mits.coop
Thu May 17 19:17:48 EDT 2007
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 07:50 -0700, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> That's fair enough, but this kind of rationale belongs in the header of
> the patch that makes that change, so that people won't be scratching
> their heads, wondering what happened.
Oh! Thanks for pointing that out. Fixed.
> The description of the patch says that it does four different things.
> That's your cue :-)
Oh I see what you mean. They're all related to the same change. I've
changed the patch header to try to explain that too. The overall goal of
fixing up sendTo / recvFrom in Network is simpler to achieve with the
listed changes. Given those additional changes wouldn't be terribly
important if it weren't for the the implementation of datagram
communication in Network, I don't think it's a good idea to split the
MITS Co-operative Limited
More information about the Libraries