why is Data.Set not a Monad?y
Stefan O'Rear
stefanor at cox.net
Sun May 6 16:03:56 EDT 2007
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 04:00:09PM -0400, Dan Doel wrote:
> above, since, for example, there already is a Monad typeclass.
You could just have used {-# OPTIONS_GHC -fno-implicit-prelude #-} and
rebound do.
> {-# OPTIONS -fglasgow-exts -fallow-undecidable-instances #-}
OPTIONS is obsolescent - new code should use OPTIONS_GHC, etc. (since
options are by there nature compiler dependant)
Stefan
More information about the Libraries
mailing list