Why the Prelude must die

[David House]

On 28/03/07, Simon Marlow <simonmarhaskell at gmail.com> wrote:
> I support both reducing the prelude to just a few commonly used combinators, and
>   requiring an explicit import Prelude.

Just to clear things up: would you need to do an import Prelude to get
at these few commonly used combinators, or would the import pull in
the 'wider' Prelude, with a more expansive selection, more akin to the
current Prelude?

-- 
-David House, dmhouse at gmail.com