Shouldn't System.Process.runInteractiveCommand close inherited descriptors above 2?

[Tomasz Zielonka]

On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 02:03:34PM -0700, Mike Gunter wrote:
> I like the way Scsh handles this.  On exec, it closes file descriptors
> for ports (Scheme's Handles) that haven't had their file descriptor
> "revealed" (i.e., been the argument to handleToFd or the return value
> from fdToHandle).

Interesting idea! One more reason to finally learn scsh.

Best regards
Tomek