package mounting

[Ketil Malde]

Frederik Eaton <frederik at a5.repetae.net> writes:

>> It looks nice, but don't you think the -package-base flag ought to
>> take both the package name *and* the mountpoint?

> My intention was that -package-base specifies a base for the package
> specified in the preceding -package flag [...]
> In other words, it is an optional argument and the syntax is

>   ghc ... -package PACKAGE -package-base BASE ...

How about something like

    ghc ... -package PACKAGE at BASE

(where the @BASE part is optional)?

-k
-- 
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants