ketil+haskell at ii.uib.no
Mon Oct 30 03:39:50 EST 2006
Frederik Eaton <frederik at a5.repetae.net> writes:
>> It looks nice, but don't you think the -package-base flag ought to
>> take both the package name *and* the mountpoint?
> My intention was that -package-base specifies a base for the package
> specified in the preceding -package flag [...]
> In other words, it is an optional argument and the syntax is
> ghc ... -package PACKAGE -package-base BASE ...
How about something like
ghc ... -package PACKAGE at BASE
(where the @BASE part is optional)?
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants
More information about the Libraries