Malcolm.Wallace at cs.york.ac.uk
Fri Nov 24 12:26:11 EST 2006
Bulat Ziganshin <bulat.ziganshin at gmail.com> wrote:
> i think that we should require H' compatibility instead of H98 one, so
> require to not use fundeps, but allow MPTC. this means that NHC should
> be ruled out as non-H' compliant compiler instead of these libs
Why pick on nhc98? Today, there are absolutely _no_ haskell-prime
compliant implementations, because there is no haskell-prime standard
yet. As and when the standard is fixed, implementations will catch up.
> but when other problems
> arrives, this may be a stop-mark, because these problems will not be
> fixed in future NHC versions
Who says? nhc98 is not dead. Yhc is a very active project, and it is
basically just a re-branding of nhc98.
More information about the Libraries