portability of Data.ByteString.Lazy

Ross Paterson ross at soi.city.ac.uk
Thu Nov 2 06:55:15 EST 2006

On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 11:51:48AM +0000, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> Or we could use a separate .Lazy.Base module for exposing the lower
> level internals of the lazy version and then not use a type alias at
> all.

That's what I was suggesting.

More information about the Libraries mailing list