New collections package ready (almost)

[Jean-Philippe Bernardy]

I've checked again and it looks like, with the CVS version of hugs,
modules that are transitively used must be exposed.

Did I miss some option in the cabal file?

Cheers,
JP.

On 3/12/06, Jean-Philippe Bernardy <jeanphilippe.bernardy at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Einar,
>
> I did some tests with a (probably bugged) version of cabal which
> required the modules to be exposed, and this is a left-over.
>
> Thanks for the feedback :)
>
> Cheers,
> JP.
>
> On 3/12/06, Einar Karttunen <ekarttun at cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:
> > On 12.03 16:03, Jean-Philippe Bernardy wrote:
> > > I've set up the new collections package, and it compiles under ghc and
> > > hugs. I don't know about nhc, because I've been unable to compile nhc.
> > > (I've got a x86_64 system; I've tryied to compile under a chroot does
> > > not work, and configure program baffles me.) The non-ghc version is
> > > portable though, so it _should_ work under nhc alright.
> >
> > Looked at the package briefly and it seems promising. Why are
> > Data.Tree.AVL.Internals.* in exposed-modules and not hidden ones?
> > Should the Data.Tree.AVL.Test.* be added at all to the library
> > or just remain there for a Makefile test target?
> >
> > - Einar Karttunen
> >
>