Who needs Ord for Sets and Maps anyway?

[Bulat Ziganshin]

Hello ajb,

Friday, January 20, 2006, 2:59:47 AM, you wrote:

>> It is also much more inline with the
>> haskell style. See for example, Num class:
>> (+) :: a -> a -> a

asn> A lot of people don't like this type, especially for multiplication.  It

and for pointer arithmetics too :)


-- 
Best regards,
 Bulat                            mailto:bulatz at HotPOP.com