Who needs Ord for Sets and Maps anyway?

ajb at spamcop.net ajb at spamcop.net
Thu Jan 19 18:59:47 EST 2006

G'day all.

Quoting Jean-Philippe Bernardy <jeanphilippe.bernardy at gmail.com>:

> It is also much more inline with the
> haskell style. See for example, Num class:
> (+) :: a -> a -> a

A lot of people don't like this type, especially for multiplication.  It
makes implementing types based on vector spaces much more complicated,
for example.

Andrew Bromage

More information about the Libraries mailing list