Haddock plan -- syntactic extensions?

[Simon Peyton-Jones]

There's a SoC project that was getting Haddock to use GHC as its front end, so that anything GHC understands Haddock will understand.
http://www.mail-archive.com/haskell@haskell.org/msg19149.html

 I think it's about 75% complete, but seems to be stalled at the moment.  David W may want to comment?

Simon

From: libraries-bounces at haskell.org [mailto:libraries-bounces at haskell.org] On Behalf Of Conal Elliott
Sent: 19 December 2006 21:41
To: libraries at haskell.org
Subject: Haddock plan -- syntactic extensions?

I'd like to know what's realistic to expect with Haddock and GHC's language extensions in the near future, particularly arrow notation and GADTs.  So far, I've been able to avoid arrow notation, at some cost some obfuscation, but I don't know how to avoid exposing Haddock to my GADTs.

Cheers, - Conal
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20061220/e88bba01/attachment-0001.htm