Data.* collections maintenance
simonmar at microsoft.com
Mon Oct 24 07:02:22 EDT 2005
On 24 October 2005 11:54, Sebastian Sylvan wrote:
> On 10/24/05, Simon Marlow <simonmar at microsoft.com> wrote:
>> DiffArray as it stands isn't very efficient. It's an interesting
>> idea, though. We should really have a DiffUArray, for one thing.
> Uh, isn't there already a DiffUArray?
> type DiffUArray = IOToDiffArray IOUArray
oops, so there is. It doesn't look very efficient, though.
> It would be interesting to benchmark this against the various maps.
> Some code isn't too heavy on insertions so a regular Array would work
> fine there. Or if it contains primitive types, unboxed arrays works as
> At any rate there probably should be an immutable HashMap
> implementation (parameterized over the array-type).
Yes, that would be nice.
More information about the Libraries