System.Posix.* not haddocked
Isaac Jones
ijones at syntaxpolice.org
Tue Nov 8 03:17:03 EST 2005
Björn Bringert <bringert at cs.chalmers.se> writes:
> Is there some special reason why the System.Posix.* modules are not
> haddocked? There seems to be documentation available in the hslibs
> docs [1]. Is it just that noone has bothered to do the copy-and-paste
> yet? If this is the case, I might try to find time to do some of it
> myself.
I did the haddock-ization, but then couldn't get the whole fptools
tree to build for a while and gave up; maybe I should have just
checked it in and let someone with a working tree fix it. Here's the
link to the archives. Might be a good starting point:
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/2005-July/004077.html
peace,
isaac
More information about the Libraries
mailing list