Time library comment

[Sven Panne]

Eric Etheridge wrote:
> [...] Don't take this too seriously.  Just know that the
> current method of achieving that kind of resolution
> requires using GLUT, which means eating up more memory
> and CPU than necessary. [...]

As the GLUT package author I'm curious what exactly eats up memory
and/or CPU. Could you explain that a bit? Perhaps there's some room
for improvement in the package...

Cheers,
    S.