Libraries needing documentation
simonmar at microsoft.com
Tue Mar 15 04:44:11 EST 2005
On 15 March 2005 07:04, Isaac Jones wrote:
> Folks have listed these libraries as needing better documentation. Is
> anyone around who is familiar with these who can add some haddock
Are people using Text.Html? I've been wondering whether it ought to be
replaced, or at least revamped. Haddock uses a local version of this
library with a number of fixes.
The HTML library in WASH seems better, but I haven't investigated it
Or perhaps HTML (XHTML to be precise) should just be a special case of
an XML library?
Anyone interested enough to take this on?
More information about the Libraries