Time Libraries Rough Draft
seth at cql.com
Fri Feb 11 05:29:03 EST 2005
Simon Marlow wrote:
>On 11 February 2005 10:11, Seth Kurtzberg wrote:
>>The problem is that it has been stated several times on this thread
>>that there will be no leap second table, nor a way to use one. If
>>that's not correct, then there is no problem.
>I think you've misunderstood. The plan was never to get rid of TAI
>altogether; the discussion has been about whether getCurrentTime should
>return TAI or something UTC-based.
Yes, you are correct, and I did miss that. Apologies.
>In case you missed it, here's Ashley's latest proposal, which includes
>full support for TAI and leap second tables:
>Libraries mailing list
>Libraries at haskell.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Libraries