Time Libraries Rough Draft

[Seth Kurtzberg]

Simon Marlow wrote:

>On 11 February 2005 10:11, Seth Kurtzberg wrote:
>
>  
>
>>The problem is that it has been stated several times on this thread
>>that there will be no leap second table, nor a way to use one.  If
>>that's not correct, then there is no problem.  
>>    
>>
>
>I think you've misunderstood.  The plan was never to get rid of TAI
>altogether; the discussion has been about whether getCurrentTime should
>return TAI or something UTC-based.
>  
>
Yes, you are correct, and I did miss that.  Apologies.

>In case you missed it, here's Ashley's latest proposal, which includes
>full support for TAI and leap second tables:
>
>  http://www.haskell.org//pipermail/libraries/2005-February/003158.html
>
>Cheers,
>	Simon
>_______________________________________________
>Libraries mailing list
>Libraries at haskell.org
>http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
>!DSPAM:420c8b46267241748010920!
>
>  
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.haskell.org//pipermail/libraries/attachments/20050211/c2b052d3/attachment.htm