DData
Ross Paterson
ross at soi.city.ac.uk
Wed May 19 12:28:23 EDT 2004
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 09:39:25AM +0100, Adrian Hey wrote:
> Here are the results for 2 tests..
>
> Test1: Build a tree/finitemap of 1000000 pairs.
> Test2: As Test1, followed by deletion of all 1000000 pairs.
>
> Pairs are inserted/deleted in numerical order [1,2..1000000]
Inserting in random order gives a less dramatic difference.
I changed your testData to
testData = take 100000 $ randomRs (0, 2^30-1) (mkStdGen 7)
(I have a slower machine), changed isEmpty to size to guarantee
strictness, and got the following times (averaged over 50 runs each):
ins ins+del
Data.FiniteMap 4.783 8.304
Data.Tree.AVL 4.561 6.895
DData.Map 4.765 7.369
DData.IntMap 4.952 7.742
(I tried to be fair by only using ! and UNPACK on Ints in each case,
and compiling them all the same way: -O.) I assume that Christian's
results imply that IntMap is better for lookup, but it doesn't look very
attractive here.
More information about the Libraries
mailing list