Heirarchical name space allocation

[Sven Panne]

Adrian Hey wrote:
> Maybe if we call what I've produced Multimedia.SDL.Core, though since
> it actually includes SDL_image and SDL_ttf also, maybe I should split
> these out to produce..
> 	Multimedia.SDL.Core
> 	Multimedia.SDL.Image
> 	Multimedia.SDL.TTF
> so anybody who felt inclined to write a binding for one of the many
> SDL extension libraries could use Multimedia.SDL.<whatever>
> (Or maybe my "Core" binding should still be just Multimedia.SDL?)

"Core" is not very descriptive IMHO, what about staying close to the structure
of the SDL library documentation (e.g. http://sdldoc.csn.ul.ie/):

    Multimedia.SDL.General
    Multimedia.SDL.Video
    Multimedia.SDL.Window
    Multimedia.SDL.Events
    ...

and using

    Multimedia.SDL

as a collector module for everything below it?

Cheers,
    S.