version control and LIP

[Seth Kurtzberg]

I didn't mean to imply anything negative about darcs.  I couldn't do 
that because I haven't had a chance to become familiar with it.

My bias is also to learn darcs first because it is written in Haskell.  
I think that is a legitimate argumentl

However, it hasn't been established that it has to be darcs or arch.  I 
understand what Krasimir is saying (that everyone has a limited amount 
of time) but that really is irrelevant to the technical discussion.

Seth

Krasimir Angelov wrote:

>--- Isaac Jones <ijones at syntaxpolice.org> wrote:
>  
>
>>Krasimir Angelov <ka2_mail at yahoo.com> writes:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Does the arch works under Windows?
>>>      
>>>
>>It seems that there is some support, as you've
>>already discovered.
>>Apparently, cygwin is only one out of 3 options:
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>http://wiki.gnuarch.org/moin.cgi/Native_20WIN32_20Support
>  
>
>>I hope you can solve this problem.  Perhaps this is
>>another reason I
>>should move to darcs?  How's darcs support in
>>windows?
>>    
>>
>
>I will try to install the native arch package but if
>we need to choice between arch and darcs I will prefer
>darcs. I both case I need to learn a new tool which is
>a disadvantage for me. I prefer the darcs because it
>is written in Haskell and because I found the theory
>of patches very original. Of course these arguments
>are very subjective and the real arguments will be
>stability, portability and supported features.
>
>Cheers,
>  Krasimir
>
>__________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
>http://mail.yahoo.com
>_______________________________________________
>Libraries mailing list
>Libraries at haskell.org
>http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
>
>!DSPAM:4055694a91924469820903!
>
>
>  
>