RealWorld
Simon Peyton-Jones
simonpj@microsoft.com
Mon, 8 Sep 2003 12:36:34 +0100
I prefer IORegion myself, because the 's' parameter of the monad isn't
really the state type itself; it's more like a name for the state. The
real state can have a type like (State s). The 's' parameter keeps
different states separate; it's not the state itself. So region is
good.
but i'm not going to die in the trenches for this one! Having said my
piece, I'll shut up
Simon
| -----Original Message-----
| From: Sven Panne [mailto:Sven.Panne@informatik.uni-muenchen.de]
| Sent: 08 September 2003 12:28
| To: Ross Paterson
| Cc: Simon Peyton-Jones; libraries@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: RealWorld
|=20
| Ross Paterson wrote:
| > On reflection, IORegion sounds a bit operational; perhaps IOState is
| > better (though I see the name is used in HOpenGL for something
else). [...]
|=20
| No problem here, it's just an internal module/type with a rather
| ad-hoc name.
|=20
| Cheers,
| S.
|=20
|=20