Library reviewing (was: RE: Haskell library infrastructure
Thu, 29 May 2003 12:58:45 +0100
Peter Simons writes:
> My idea was that a library was to be discussed ("reviewed") on this
> list before it was included in the stable repository, so that
> duplication of code can be avoided.
Peer reviewing of libraries is a good idea, and I'd like to see us doing
more of that for the libraries in general.
I think I'm proposing that if there's a review process, that it be
adopted consistently rather than just for the haskell-libs project.
Would you (Peter, or anyone else) like to put together a proposal for
how this might work? Something that can be included in the library
document would be ideal.