Seeking More Advice on Library

Eray Ozkural erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr
Wed, 7 May 2003 19:47:15 +0300


On Wednesday 07 May 2003 18:34, Matthew Donadio wrote:
>
> Any other thoughts?

Name redundancy: Poly.Poly, Poly.polysubst   Is this redundancy essential? You 
are assuming the user will include the module's scope, right?

Polynomial functions: the scientific computing community has a great variety 
of algorithms for solution of numerical problems you might find many things 
of use in their writings. Just an off-the-top-of my head remark.

There is surely a lot to be done in mathematical libraries. I had looked for a 
clean, small DCT routine and I had to write it myself when I implemented a 
sound synthesizer. (I just wrote the formula as it is so it wasn't efficient 
:) )

Regards,

-- 
Eray Ozkural (exa) <erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr>
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara  KDE Project: http://www.kde.org
www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo  Malfunction: http://mp3.com/ariza
GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F 88B0 A745 F31B  EA0F 7C07 AE16 874D 539C