Seeking More Advice on Library
Eray Ozkural
erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr
Wed, 7 May 2003 19:47:15 +0300
On Wednesday 07 May 2003 18:34, Matthew Donadio wrote:
>
> Any other thoughts?
Name redundancy: Poly.Poly, Poly.polysubst Is this redundancy essential? You
are assuming the user will include the module's scope, right?
Polynomial functions: the scientific computing community has a great variety
of algorithms for solution of numerical problems you might find many things
of use in their writings. Just an off-the-top-of my head remark.
There is surely a lot to be done in mathematical libraries. I had looked for a
clean, small DCT routine and I had to write it myself when I implemented a
sound synthesizer. (I just wrote the formula as it is so it wasn't efficient
:) )
Regards,
--
Eray Ozkural (exa) <erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr>
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara KDE Project: http://www.kde.org
www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo Malfunction: http://mp3.com/ariza
GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F 88B0 A745 F31B EA0F 7C07 AE16 874D 539C