Ketil Z. Malde
19 Jun 2003 15:59:42 +0200
"Simon Marlow" <email@example.com> writes:
> Haskell does have a standard 64 bit Int, known as Int64.
Okay. I'm still not convinced it's a good idea to tie things to a
specific data type. What about CPUs with only native 32bit support,
and programs that only need to manipulate small amounts of time? What
about computers with a >64 bit native type?
> My guess is that there won't be enough of a difference for it to matter.
...and I don't think it's entirely given that two 64 bit numbers will
be faster than one Integer.
> POSIX "seconds since the epoch" is a *real* kludge. Let's not get the
> two confused.
Sorry, my bad.
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants