Process issues (was Re: Lang)

[Ashley Yakeley]

At 2001-03-13 09:04, Dylan Thurston wrote:

>On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 03:18:32PM +0000, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
>> Ok, I acknowledge that.  I think we seem to be gradually coming to
>> a consensus on Marcin's point - that the functionality of a library
>> should be paramount in the naming scheme, regardless of implementation,
>> standardness, portability, etc.  This is good.
>
>With the exception of the Prelude, right?

Is a Prelude even necessary? Might it not be better to import what you 
want explicitly?

-- 
Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA