Alternative hierarchy proposal.

[Dylan Thurston]

On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 02:05:14AM -0800, Simon Marlow wrote:
> > * GHC
> >     Probably better under Lang.CompilerSpecific.GHC?
> 
> Maybe.  We're going to be writing the Lang.CompilerSpecific.GHC prefix a
> lot while implementing libraries, though.

If you allow relative module paths, you don't have this problem
wherever you decide to put GHC.

It might be a bit tricky getting the relative module paths to work right
if you have a deeply nested hierarchy under GHC.

Best,
	Dylan Thurston