[jhc] Re: jhc-0.7.1 and parsec-2.1.0.1

John Meacham john at repetae.net
Tue Sep 1 14:00:58 EDT 2009


On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 10:28:48AM +0200, Christian Maeder wrote:
> John Meacham wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 02:07:17PM +0200, Christian Maeder wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've tried to compile (part of) parsec-2.1.0.1 with jhc-0.7.1
> >>
> >> and Parsec.Combinator had several problems with do-expression as infix
> >> arguments, which should be simple to fix for you. I.e.
> >>
> >>   do{ p; return ()} <|> return ()
> >>
> >> needed explicit parenthesis:
> >>
> >>   (do{ p; return ()}) <|> return ()
> >>
> >> (also if layout is used instead of curly braces)
> > 
> > Hmm.. okay. this may be related to 
> > http://repetae.net/computer/jhc/bug/issue-35cc6ddc1a577e163e9830b96f89151f0562c029.html
> > I'll look into it. thanks for the report!
> 
> No, it's the infix analysis. The "where"-Problem has to do with your
> different offside (by one).

Ah. I see what is happening. I am desugaring before re-fixitying the
source code. Thanks! I see the issue now. I was thinking it was a
parsing problem.

        John

-- 
John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈ - http://notanumber.net/


More information about the jhc mailing list