[Hugs-users] wrong infered types?

Neil Mitchell ndmitchell at gmail.com
Fri Jan 11 10:57:21 EST 2008


Hi

In future, you are probably best off addressing these general
questions to the haskell-cafe@ mailing list.

> f a = let m = id a in do return m

We can simplify this to:

f a = let m = id a in do return m
f a = let m = a in do return m
f a = do return a
f a = return a

This shows why f has the same type as return.

>  f' a = do m <- id a
>            return m

f' a = id a >>= \m -> return m
f' a = a >>= \m -> return m

You basically return a, but have sent it through >>= which means it
must be monadic.

>  g a = let m =[a,a] in do return m

g a = return [a,a]

> g' a = do m <- [a,a]
>           return m

This is the tricky one. Here your use of m <- [a,a] has bound the
Monad in question to be the list Monad, hence you get a result in
terms of lists, not monads. do notation applies to any monad,
including list.

Thanks

Neil


More information about the Hugs-Users mailing list