[Hugs-users] A New Notation for Arrows

Benjamin L. Russell dekudekuplex at yahoo.com
Fri Sep 21 00:07:27 EDT 2007

Are there any plans to fix the preprocessor or update
Hugs so that scope errors or type errors will be
reported against the source code, rather than against
the preprocessor output?  That would render debugging
with new notation for arrows just as easy to
accomplish with Hugs as with GHC.

-- Benjamin L. Russell

--- Ross Paterson <ross at soi.city.ac.uk> wrote:

> ....
> I've fixed the binary link, but you might as well
> use GHC for arrows.
> If you use the preprocessor, scope errors or type
> errors will be harder
> to track down, as they'll be reported against the
> preprocessor output,
> which is rather obfuscated.  GHC will report them
> against the source
> you wrote.
> _______________________________________________
> Hugs-Users mailing list
> Hugs-Users at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/hugs-users

More information about the Hugs-Users mailing list