Syntax for implicit parameters

[Johan Nordlander]

>> The let/dlet/with issue is still open, but there's really
>> nothing that precludes anyone from just making a decision.
>> Alastair is most welcome to implement something that will make
>> Hugs compatible with GHC.
>
> The thing is, hugs *is* currently compatible w/ GHC on this.

Should read: compatible with whatever the designers/implementors 
of the implicit parameters feature wants it to be!

-- Johan