[HOpenGL] Re: GLUT documentation

[Ross Paterson]

On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 04:05:32PM +0100, Sven Panne wrote:
> Frankly, I don't really care about the legal status of my docs anymore, and
> will leave it in HOpenGL. If some distributions have a problem with this, so
> be it... I've done the best I could do to clarify this and made no gratuitous
> additions to GLUT (which is exactly what Mark tries to prohibit).

I'm not thinking so much of distributions as cvs.haskell.org, which is
involved in violating an explicit statement by the author.  I didn't
think we did that sort of thing.