[Haskell] Empty instance declaration
isaacdupree at charter.net
Fri Dec 28 12:35:51 EST 2007
Neil Mitchell wrote:
> If the default
> methods form a cycle, and the user has not broken that cycle by
> inserting a real implementation, that's almost certainly a bug - I'd
> go as far as to say its an error rather than a warning.
I'd agree except that
"instance Num () where"
with no specified definitions
is already allowed in Haskell and can only generate warnings in GHC already.
More information about the Haskell