[Haskell] Re: ghc.haddock?
ashley at semantic.org
Thu Aug 16 02:45:43 EDT 2007
Isaac Dupree wrote:
> haddock.ghc and ghc.haddock are different. Haddock.ghc needs a GHC with
> the patches from ghc.haddock. The latest GHC 6.7 has ghc.haddock
> patches. Haddock.ghc is the new haddock, which requires those GHC
> capabilities. So you need GHC 6.7 *and* haddock.ghc. Does that clear
> up the rather confusing naming scheme?
So presumably ghc.haddock provides some new API that haddock.ghc uses to
get parse information?
More information about the Haskell