[Haskell] Re: ghc.haddock?

[Ashley Yakeley]

Isaac Dupree wrote:

> haddock.ghc and ghc.haddock are different.  Haddock.ghc needs a GHC with 
> the patches from ghc.haddock.  The latest GHC 6.7 has ghc.haddock 
> patches.  Haddock.ghc is the new haddock, which requires those GHC 
> capabilities.  So you need GHC 6.7 *and* haddock.ghc.  Does that clear 
> up the rather confusing naming scheme?

So presumably ghc.haddock provides some new API that haddock.ghc uses to 
get parse information?

-- 
Ashley Yakeley