isaacdupree at charter.net
Tue Aug 14 17:20:34 EDT 2007
Conal Elliott wrote:
> Hi David. Thanks for the reply.
> I'm pretty confused. I understand your first paragraph as saying *not* to
> use that repo, and the second as saying to use it. Is the new haddock
> included in GHC 6.7 or is it still an app that works separately from GHC?
> If the latter, where is the app's repo?
haddock.ghc and ghc.haddock are different. Haddock.ghc needs a GHC with
the patches from ghc.haddock. The latest GHC 6.7 has ghc.haddock
patches. Haddock.ghc is the new haddock, which requires those GHC
capabilities. So you need GHC 6.7 *and* haddock.ghc. Does that clear
up the rather confusing naming scheme?
More information about the Haskell