[Haskell] ANN: Efficient, dynamically compiled, lazy
functional semantics on JVM, having tight integration with the Java
luke.evans at businessobjects.com
Thu Sep 28 05:20:35 EDT 2006
It could be for a subset of Haskell (probably a large one). Haskell has
some features that CAL does not (many just syntactic sugar, some not)
we¹re actually working on a short paper to summarise the differences,
primarily for people on this list. Even without a one-to-one
correspondence, this might work in many situations where special lower level
CAL could be generated in lieu of higher-level Haskell features. Still, you
would probably be able to go a very long way with not much more than
straightforward syntax transformations. Of course, use of Haskell libraries
would either have to be mapped to CAL ones, or the Haskell library functions
converted themselves (with this treatment applied recursively to dependees).
On 9/26/06 10:52 PM, "Tomasz Zielonka" <tomasz.zielonka at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 09:22:21PM -0700, Luke Evans wrote:
>> > Here are a few 'highlights' from our feature list:
>> > - A lazily evaluated, strictly-typed language called CAL, with many
>> > similarities to Haskell
> Do you think that CAL would be a good target for a Haskell compiler?
> In other words, would it be a good idea to use CAL as an intermediate
> language for a Haskell -> Java byte-code compiler?
> Best regards
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Haskell