[Haskell] Re: License for haskell.org content

Ketil Malde ketil.malde at bccs.uib.no
Mon Jan 9 07:43:42 EST 2006

Simon Marlow <simonmar at microsoft.com> writes:

>> Thus defaulting the FDL for all wiki content, including code, is a
>> very bad idea.

> I agree - can we please use BSD or public domain?

Another option is the Open Publication License, which requires
acknowledgement (but little else).  Anyway, I think a point that
should be taken into consideration is that you can usually tighten the
licensing later on, while making it more liberal can be difficult.

If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants

More information about the Haskell mailing list